Monday, December 05, 2005
A palaeontologist's view of manuscripts
Can a palaeontologist really work out how many copies of a work there have been? Has anyone looked at Cisne's work?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is a forum for people with knowledge of the Bible in its original languages to discuss its manuscripts and textual history from the perspective of historic evangelical theology.
The membership of this blog is made up of evangelicals involved in academic study of textual criticism. Those with appropriate expertise and theological convictions who wish to be considered for membership should contact Peter Head or Tommy Wasserman. Those applying for membership must indicate that they have read either the OT or the NT in its original language(s), should be actively involved in text-critical research, and should be already contributing to the blog through comments. They should give e-mail details of an academic and a pastoral referee, a summary of their academic and/or ministry involvement, a statement of their doctrinal commitment (which may be by reference to various classic evangelical statements of faith, e.g. 39 Articles, Westminster Confession), and an indication of their area of interest within textual criticism. Non-members who wish to comment are not expected to be evangelical, but they are requested to respect the blog's ethos.
1 Comments:
Cisne, J. 2005. How science survived: Medieval manuscripts' "demography" and
classic texts' extinction. Science 307(Feb. 25):1305-1307. Available at
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/307/5713/1305
Well, call me an old sceptic, but I don't think this is going to help anybody.
The modelling is both too complicated and too simplistic. It is too complicated in the general sense that it involves mathematics (something I repented of long ago). It is too simplistic in the sense that it transposes population growth assumptions onto the manuscripts (e.g. each manuscript is equal in its ability to reproduce - something that I doubt is true).
I suppose it is worth thinking about what variables to input into the modelling. The response article has some useful reflections:
Gilman, S.L., and F.E. Glaze. 2005. Enhanced: "How science
survived"-medieval manuscripts as fossils. Science 307(Feb. 25):1208-1209.
Available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/307/5713/1208
Thanks to Wieland Willker for posting the titles to the textualcriticism email group.
Post a Comment